Two important things have happened since we published part two of our review of the ReSound LiNX Quattro. And the changes have obliged us to go back and add a correction or two.
Firstly, the much anticipated arrival of Goggle’s ASHA (audio streaming for hearing aids). Secondly, the announcement of the new Bluetooth 5.2 standard. This adds Low Energy Audio streaming (LE Audio), a significant development that includes… audio streaming for hearing aids.
The big mistake was to assume that the former was a subset of the latter. ASHA and LE Audio are only very distant cousins.
AN OVER-THE-AIR (VIA THE SMART 3D APP) update to the LiNX Quattro firmware last December prepared the hearing aids to receive Google’s new version of Bluetooth audio, ASHA.
Transmission of this audio requires Android 10, the newest available version of the Android operating system and in February of this year Google very kindly sent Tested Technology a Pixel 3a phone running this version.
We’ll report on this in part 3 of the LiNX Quattro review.
The Bluetooth SIG development came as a total surprise. At a meeting in early March organised by the Bluetooth Hearing Aid Working Group I learnt that the new standard they had been developing for Bluetooth 5.2 included a radical update to the Low Energy (LE) implementation.
ASHA and LE Audio
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) was incorporated into Bluetooth version 4.0 ten years ago. As its name implies, it was designed primarily to save power. Without sacrificing range, the standard uses lower bandwidth and omits some of the functions of the “Classic” full implementation. One of these omitted functions was audio streaming.
Wireless audio streaming wasn’t a big thing back then. But times have changed and when Bluetooth audio streaming (using Classic Bluetooth) began to burgeon there was a scramble to re-engineer BLE to make it fit for this purpose. Battery life was becoming an issue, particularly as the Bluetooth receiving devices (“sinks” in the technical jargon) became smaller and smaller.
As it turns out, it was a double-barrelled scramble between two factions: the Bluetooth Hearing Aid Working Group on the one hand and Google’s Android Accessibility Group on the other.
ASHA works. ReSound’s holding company, GN, backed this Google/Android venture from the start, promising “the world’s first streaming Android hearing aids” with the launch of the LiNX Quattro in 2018. The promise of Android streaming has finally come true, although the LiNX Quattro was pipped at the post by Phonak’s Audéo Marvel, which jumped the gun by using Classic Bluetooth.
With the firmware update of December last year and with the right smartphones, currently limited to Google’s own Pixel range and one or two Samsung phones, all updated to Android 10, the ReSound LiNX Quattro can be paired directly to the Bluetooth output to receive the phone’s audio output over BLE.
Android thus achieves what Apple was able to offer to its own users six years ago. The very wide range of “Made for iPhone” compatible hearing devices actually includes the LiNX Quattro, one of the first hearing aids to offer this capability. Android has a lot of catching up to do on this front.
LE Audio will be rolling out this year in Bluetooth 5.2. Will it be compatible with today’s Bluetooth hardware, designed for Bluetooth 5.0? Bluetooth SIG members tell me the answer is “yes”, with an appropriate firmware update. The caveat is that Bluetooth 5.2 will come with its own new generation of hardware, designed to handle LE Audio more efficiently.
The crunch point will be in the hearing aids. When you stream to your hearing aids using an intermediate streaming device, as you can with the LiNX Quattro, standard Classic Bluetooth is handling the first leg of the journey. The connection between the streaming device and your hearing aids will use a proprietary (read “kluged by the hearing aid manufacturer”) adaptation of BLE. Whether the hardware handling this connection can be firmware updated to LE Audio is the big question. And the answer may well be No.
All the above applies equally in the case of the LiNX Quattro’s proven ASHA connection. With one difference that might be significant: Google’s ASHA implementation isn’t a proprietary kluge. It’s an open source kluge. This suggests that if the hearing aid manufacturer has based its ASHA on Bluetooth 5.0 hardware it may be firmware updatable to handle LE Audio.
Hats off to Google (and the Bluetooth SIG)
Effectively, what Google has done is to provide an open source, free for all workaround in answer to Apple’s proprietary adaptation of BLE. Apple is famous for designing its own software and hardware standards and hugging them tightly to itself.
In fairness, though, this unsharing ethos has largely informed the hearing aid industry too. This seems very likely to change over the next few years as hearables in general mature into commodity items in much the same way as the personal computer industry in the late ’70s and early ’80s.
Of course, nobody should expect the huge amount of human labour and ingenuity put into development like this to go unrewarded. But there are industry-standard ways of opening up a new resource like power-saving audio streaming to the whole world while still retaining an income stream in return.
However, as with all existing Bluetooth products, components and end-user devices will have to be qualified against the Bluetooth SIG’s specifications before they can carry the branding. Currently, this will cost manufacturers $4,000 for each product range.
Obviously, vendors of popular consumer products will do rather better out of this deal than specialists like hearing aid manufacturers selling into a much smaller market. But even so, for them this should amount to only a few cents for each individual product. It’s the end user, of course, who ultimately foots the bill. But the incremental cost of what in this case is a huge benefit will very likely be invisibly small.
Not only are ASHA and LE Audio completely different ways of adding audio streaming to Bluetooth Low Energy, they have each been developed with no relation at all one to the other. The two development teams haven’t even been in discussions over the past years it’s taken to develop these standards.
Why did these two development strands fail to coordinate their efforts?
I had occurred to us that as Android’s contribution was to be open source and the Bluetooth SIG’s development (although RAND-Z, see above) largely comprised proprietary intellectual property, this “Chinese Wall” was something Google would have to insist on. It would be crucial to ensure the resulting code was “untainted”.*
*We haven’t been able to persuade Google to confirm or deny this guess. In fact, Google’s response to all our enquiries about ASHA has been a series of dull thud “no comments”.
This is very unusual for any open source development and seems to lend strength to the view that ASHA, at best, is only a stepping stone to the future of wireless audio.
NFMI versus Bluetooth LE
Tested Technology has been something of an evangelist for NFMI (near field magnetic induction) as a means of communication between two associated hearing aids but also as a technique to support body area networks (BAN) in general. The advantages over Bluetooth in these contexts seemed compelling.
There was a suggestion at the Bluetooth SIG meeting that in the light of what LE Audio has been able to achieve, NFMI may be approaching the end of its short but very secure rope. NFMI operates in the low megahertz range using a form of wireless transmission very similar to the familiar telecoil. This gives it the key advantage of being able to travel from ear to ear across the brain without being significantly obstructed by the living tissue or risking harm to it.
Personally, I remain to be convinced about this. The higher the frequency, the less able the signal is to travel through material and the more direct the path needs to be.
True, Bluetooth uses WiFi’s 2.4GHz band which is less directional and more penetrative than WiFi’s other 5GHz band. And it may be that in the lab, with specially designed (and probably obtrusive) aerials, BLE 2.4GHz could be shown to allow enough “bend” to travel round the outside of the skull. Reflections of the signal off exterior objects like walls and ceilings could help here. But the system would have to work in the open as well.
In any case, low energy Bluetooth transmission between a pair of hearing aids will be rather less power efficient than NFMI, which requires impressively little juice. But as hearable devices become smaller and smaller, manufacturers would be happy to save space and complexity by omitting NFMI and using only a single hardware radio system*.
Devices that are purely sinks for audio streaming will certainly be able to get along without NFMI. Bluetooth LE Audio transmission embeds synchronisation signals. This scheme allows two separate streams, one to each earpiece, to be synced to within 20 microseconds. Using this system, there’s no need for the individual receiving devices to intercommunicate.
But hearing aids do more than receive streaming radio. Microphones to pick up atmospheric sound waves are obviously crucial. And they’ve become very sophisticated. Typically there will be a pair of microphones in each hearing aid, each microphone receiving similar information at very slightly different times.
Tiny time intervals like this are the clues the brain needs to pin-point the various sounds in the surroundings and, if necessary, to distinguish between useful information (like speech) and background noise. Instead of several microphones, the unaugmented human ear uses the multiple reflections off the convolutions of the pinnae to derive this information.
For the hearing impaired, the four microphones in the twin hearing aids seek to emulate this. But to do so, all four microphones need to pool their data and will therefore have to intercommunicate.
With a fast and reliable wireless connection between the hearing aids and a sufficiently speedy processor it’s possible to derive up to eight virtual microphones—four stereo pairs— from these data. An NFMI interconnection remains the best way to do this.
For this reason, it seems unlikely that LE Audio will see off NFMI as the standard for hearing aid intercommunication any time soon.
Much of what I’ve written here is speculation, based on research, marketing material and discussions with experts in the field. On balance, I’m concluding that the next wave of hearing aids from the major manufacturers will be built around Bluetooth 5.2. The GN/Google ASHA enterprise will become a historical footnote.
But, to borrow Bertrand Russell’s summary of young Wittgenstein’s philosophy of the future: “That the sun will rise tomorrow is a hypothesis.” Bill Gates may have seen the present coronavirus crisis coming. But did you? Did I?
In truth, all we have is the present. ASHA is here now and it works. How well, and with what limitations, we set out in part 3 of our LiNX Quattro review.
Chris Bidmead 2020/03/12